THIS BLOG is NOW RETIRED

I began this blog in May 2009 following the death of Marcia Powell at Perryville State Prison in Goodyear, Arizona. It is not intended to prescribe the path that leads to freedom from the prison industrial complex.

Rather, these are just my observations in arguably the most racist, fascist, militaristic state in the nation at a critical time in history for a number of intersecting liberation movements. From Indigenous resistance to genocidal practices, to the fight over laws like SB1070 and the ban on Ethnic Studies, Arizona is at the center of many battles for human rights, and thus the struggle for prison abolition as well - for none are free until all are. I retired the blog in APRIL 2013.

Visit me now at Arizona Prison Watch or Survivors of Prison Violence-AZ

David Rovics: We Are Everywhere

To my fellow activists now struggling through life - let this be a reminder that you are not alone and that we desperately need you here. All the injustice, grief, war, and human suffering calls for us to stay and do everything we can about it - you can't help us anymore when you're gone. Don't give up the fight - your last shred of hope may just keep someone else alive, too.
BLOG POSTS

Monday, January 11, 2010

CCA: More Sexual Abuse of Prisoners.

So, small town Arizona - are you sure this is who you want to have as your grandchild's employer - or you niece's incarcerator? Want the CCA warden to be your mayor? You can someday be known like Otter Creek will be - as that town where all those women were raped in prison. 



If we as individuals aided and abetted in multiple sexual assaults and/or covering them up, we would - and should - be prosecuted. But as a corporate entity, while Corrections Corporation of America has the rights of a human (more than prisoners, I would say), it seems to have to take no responsibility for its actions whatsoever - maybe a little hit in the cash box once in awhile. The towns that host these places and turn their backs on the prisoners inside also seem to have no sense of responsibility for what happens, so long as they get what they wanted out of the deal.


The summation that the main source of all the sexual abuse is that there weren’t enough female officers at Otter Creek presumes that their male officers can’t and shouldn’t be trusted to conduct themselves professionally without a constant check on their behavior in place, preventing the opportunity for sexual abuse to even arise – which there should be, both for theirs and the prisoners' protection. But what’s the point of having male officers if they can’t be trusted unsupervised and are really sexual predators in the making? There's more going on than that. What about prisons or law enforcement attracts or produces brutal, exploitative people like them? 


The “solution” to the problems at Otter Creek  strikes me as ludicrous - rape isn't just about sex, it's about power, control, violence. There's no reason to believe that swapping genders of prisoners at Otter Creek will prevent further abuse of prisoners; I fully expect the men to be abused there as well, just in different ways. The problem is in the contempt they have for prisoners and the whole culture of incarceration. It's also embedded in the primary purpose of the corporation: to confine and control the greatest number of prisoners at the least possible cost for the greatest possible profit to shareholders (they give a cut to the host town, too, of course, to make sure they keep everyone’s hands equally bloody). That’s it. That’s what they do. That makes anyone who enters their facility in the wrong color jump suit a source of revenue, not a human being. 


 CCA can corrupt everyone, even those who resist...they will, if you let them. I'd argue that in engaging the resistance primarily around issues of economics and public safety (the town's, not the prisoners'), they've already corrupted the debate by avoiding the human rights implications of profiting from the oppression and exploitation of mass numbers of people. Punishment is problematic enough as it is when just the state does the job. 


This stuff with Otter Creek is glossed over in this article (though that's our Ken from PCWG giving them hell). There's no excuse for allowing CCA to continue to operate anything there. If you’re living in a town they have their sights set on for a prison, beware. The devil talks up a sweet deal and makes it go down easy with cold hard cash and visions of a thriving town and stable middle class – but you can bet that given who’s selling, it’s still going to land you in hell if you buy it. 
 
 
So, isn't having this charming monster move into your community more of a threat to public welfare and safety than the "prisoner families" that so often get trashed in local rags and private prison resistance movements?
------------

January 8, 2010
By Stephenie Steitzer

FRANKFORT, Ky. — Gov. Steve Beshear announced Friday that the state will move more than 400 women prisoners out of the privately run Otter Creek Correctional Center, amid allegations of sexual misconduct by male workers there.

The women prisoners will be transferred to the state-run Western Kentucky Correctional Complex in Fredonia this summer — and the nearly 700 male inmates there will be moved to Otter Creek in Eastern Kentucky, which has 656 beds, and other prisons in the state, he said.

At least six workers at Otter Creek have been criminally charged with sex-related crimes involving inmates at the facility, run by Nashville-based Corrections Corp. of America.

Kentucky State Police spokesman Mike Goble said Friday that state police expect to present another case to a Floyd County grand jury next month.

“There is no place for this kind of behavior in our system,” Beshear said Friday.

He said the move would save taxpayers “millions of dollars” a year because the state would pay CCA less per day for males than females.

But Justice Cabinet Secretary J. Michael Brown acknowledged the private company that operates Otter Creek could end up making more money off the deal, because the state would likely house more male prisoners at Otter Creek than it had female prisoners.

Ken Kopczynski, executive director of the Private Corrections Institute, a Florida-based anti-privatization group, said he believes the deal rewards Otter Creek for failing to protect female inmates from alleged sexual abuse.

He said the state should've sanctioned Corrections Corp. of America for not being able to meet the terms of the contract struck last fall, which included minimum staffing levels and female worker ratios.

The state's contract with CCA allows the state to fine the company up to $5,000 a day, but it has never imposed any staffing-level sanctions.

“It's an abdication of the state's responsibility first off to hold the vendors to the contract and then to reward them for bad performance,” Kopczynski said.

Corrections Corp. of America has been under fire since last summer after multiple inmates at Otter Creek made allegations that they were sexual assaulted by corrections officers and other workers there.

A Department of Corrections investigation found that authorities at the prison failed to investigate seven alleged incidents of sexual contact between workers and inmates since 2007.

In four of those cases, the workers involved were fired. But investigations, required under the federal Prison Rape Elimination Act, were not conducted.

The state of Hawaii moved its nearly 200 women prisoners out of Otter Creek, in part because of the incidents. Kentucky officials, however, extended its contract with CCA for one year last fall.

Brown said officials are in the process of renegotiating its contract under the new arrangement. He said he hopes to have the contract in place by July 1, the start of next fiscal year.

Beshear attributed some of the problems at Otter Creek to the lack of female corrections officers and said that because the state pays more than CCA, it would have an easier time recruiting female corrections officers to work at the Western Kentucky prison.

However Corrections Commissioner LaDonna Thompson said she doesn't expect to hire additional officers and would instead transfer female workers from nearby prisons if necessary.

“We think this change will pay off in better management for inmates,” Beshear said.

When the state extended the Otter Creek contract with CCA in the fall, it said it was requiring CCA to raise its ratio of female workers.

Brown did not answer when asked whether CCA was having difficulty meeting the new requirement.

“All I can say is we presented CCA what our intent was and asked them to partner with us,” he said. “They are very much on board in that effort, I can tell you that.”

CCA issued a statement Friday applauding the new arrangement.

“CCA welcomes the opportunity to continue meeting Kentucky's correctional needs at Otter Creek,” said Steve Conry, a vice president of operations.

The new arrangement could benefit CCA because the state likely will fill all 653 beds — including the 180 have been vacant since Hawaii pulled its inmates last year.

But Brown and Beshear said taxpayers will still come out ahead by as much as $2.2 million annually after the first year, even if CCA's contract grows.

“They may come out with more, but nothing they come out with is going to be to the detriment of the commonwealth,” Brown said. “The governor has already indicated that right now we are going to be operating … at less funds than we had before. I certainly don't have any more money to give away.”

Justice Cabinet spokeswoman Jennifer Brislin added later that the state also would save money by pulling female inmates out of local jails, where the state pays counties a per diem, and housing them at the Western Kentucky center.

The state will have to pay to modify the plumbing there to accommodate women prisoners; officials didn't have a cost estimate Friday.

Reporter Stephenie Steitzer can be reached at (502) 875-5136.

1 comment:

  1. EXCEPTIONALLY WELL WRITTEN BLOG. My sister is currently housed there. I am in constant fear for her.

    ReplyDelete